The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Martin Sunnqvist. Photo.

Martin Sunnqvist

Professor

Portrait of Martin Sunnqvist. Photo.

Heraldisk efterbildning och förväxlingsrisk i det rättsliga skyddet för statsvapen och statsemblem

Author

  • Martin Sunnqvist

Summary, in Swedish

In international law, according to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, a coat of arms of a state and other state emblems are protected against use in trademarks. Included in the protection is also ”any imitation from a heraldic point of view” of the protected emblem. This phrase has been further defined in EU law. The Court of Justice of the European Union held in the ”American Clothing” case in 2009 that the heraldic description of the coat of arms must be assessed, but details that a heraldist but not the general public might notice are to be disregarded. This provides national coats of arms and emblems with a far-reaching protection. In the ”von Hannover” case from the EU Tribunal in 2011, the court applied this approach in a case where there were historic reasons for both the state and the applicant to use similar emblems. In the two cases ”Stockholms Elbolag” and ”Korona Pay” from 2020 and 2022, the Swedish patent and market courts applied the principles from the ”American Clothing” judgment on the Swedish three crowns and the royal crown respectively. In both cases, the Swedish courts found that the similarities between the state symbols and the trademarks were sufficient for a member of the general public to perceive the trademarks as ”imitations from a heraldic point of view” of the protected emblems. Swedish legislation, requiring the similarity to be such that the emblem and the trademark can ”easily can be confused”, was interpreted in conformity with the phrase ”any imitation from a heraldic point of view” according to the Paris convention.

Department/s

  • Department of Law
  • Legal history

Publishing year

2023

Language

Swedish

Pages

447-460

Publication/Series

Heraldisk tidsskrift

Volume

13

Issue

127

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Societas Heraldica Scandinavica

Topic

  • Law

Keywords

  • Rättshistoria
  • Heraldik
  • Legal history
  • Heraldry

Status

Published

Research group

  • Legal history

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0440-6966