The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Anna Zemskova. Photo.

Anna Zemskova

Postdoc

Portrait of Anna Zemskova. Photo.

Foundational Principles and the Rule of Law in the European Union : How to Adjudicate in a Rule-of-Law Crisis, and Why Solidarity Is Essential

Author

  • Xavier Groussot
  • Anna Zemskova
  • Katarina Bungerfeldt

Summary, in English

In the seminal cases C-156/21 and C-157/21 (‘Budget Conditionality Cases’) the Court of Justice of the European Union demonstrated a shift in the perception of the operational functionality of foundational values of the EU, establishing that the rule of law is a founding value of the Union which represents a legal norm and imposes an obligation on the Member States to comply with its constituent elements. Such an interpretation of the CJEU, however, raises a few questions about the possibility of adjudicating the foundational values enshrined in Article 2 TEU and their extended role in the EU constitutional framework. Given the latest developments in the Court’s case law, can all the foundational values under Article 2 TEU then acquire the status of legal norms and become ‘foundational’ or ‘founding’ principles? Does the attainment of this status happen automatically, or does a value need to fulfil specific criteria in order to obtain the necessary normativity, that would in turn make it enforceable? And how will the answer to that question affect our understanding of the role and function of the Court in EU law adjudication? In our contribution, we are going to attempt to address these very questions on the basis of four different premises. In Part I, the first premise – the possibility of the values of the EU becoming normative principles – will be discussed though theoretical and practical prisms. In Part II, the notion of ‘foundational (or ‘founding’) principles and their relation to values will be explicated in light of the Budget Conditionality Cases and as EU principles of the highest constitutional rank. In Part III, and still in light of the Budget Conditionality Cases, the principle of solidarity will be analysed and presented as a foundational and legal principle of EU law. In Part IV, the idea of the CJEU as a ‘deontic’ Court will be outlined and then challenged on its grounds. This will be followed by some concluding remarks.

Department/s

  • Department of Law
  • Public Law
  • EU Law
  • Human Rights Law

Publishing year

2022-08-31

Language

English

Pages

1-19

Publication/Series

Nordic Journal of European Law

Volume

5

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article

Topic

  • Law

Keywords

  • EU law
  • EU-rätt

Status

Published

Research group

  • Public Law
  • EU Law
  • Human Rights Law

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2003-1785