The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Angelica Ericsson. Photo.

Angelica Ericsson

Doctoral student

Portrait of Angelica Ericsson. Photo.

EU Law and the Discretion of Private National Decision-Makers, in Light of the Court’s Judgment in Case C-22/18, TopFit and Biffi

Author

  • Angelica Ericsson

Summary, in English

This contribution aims to introduce the reader to a judgement from the Court of Justice which seems to broaden the scope of application of EU free movement rules to private regulatory bodies in two ways. On the one hand, this judgment expands our understanding of what type of private regulation can fall within this scope. On the other hand, it shows that EU law requires a private prior authorisation scheme to be infused with the same objectivity safeguards as those that have been required for public ones.

Department/s

  • EU Law
  • Department of Law

Publishing year

2020-12-26

Language

English

Pages

82-82

Publication/Series

Nordic Journal of European Law

Volume

3

Issue

2

Document type

Journal article

Topic

  • Law

Keywords

  • EU law
  • EU-rätt

Status

Published

Research group

  • EU Law

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2003-1785