The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Vilhelm Persson. Photo.

Vilhelm Persson

Professor

Portrait of Vilhelm Persson. Photo.

Experiences of Ethical Review : Perspectives of Swedish Researchers in Social Science and Humanities

Author

  • William Bülow
  • Mats Johansson
  • Vilhelm Persson
  • Lena Wahlberg

Summary, in English

This paper presents the results from a qualitative study with Swedish researchers in the social sciences and the humanities. The aim of the study was to explore researchers’ perceptions of ethical review (i.e. the pros and cons of the system) and to what extent the system of ethical review could possibly be reformed to better accommodate research in the social sciences and the humanities. To this end, 7 semi-structured group interviews were conducted during the spring of 2024. In total, 18 researchers from different fields of social sciences and the humanities participated, including business, language studies, history, educational science, health and society, political science, psychology, human rights, youth studies, legal studies, religious studies, gender studies, sociology, and peace and conflict studies. The results of the study show that the perceptions of the participants vary significantly when it comes to the issue of whether ethical review should be externally regulated. While some participants clearly favoured a system of self-governance, others say that ethical review should indeed be regulated externally for reasons of fairness and impartiality. Many of the participants say that the process of applying for ethical review suffers from lack of support from the Ethical Review Authority and that the bureaucracy of ethical review focuses too much on technicalities that researchers not always find relevant. They also report that the system is associated with fear of doing wrong and that some researchers sometimes deliberately choose research topics or methods that do not require ethical approval.

Department/s

  • Medical Ethics
  • LU Profile Area: Human rights
  • Human Rights Law
  • Health Law
  • Public Law
  • Department of Law
  • Law, Evidence and Cognition (LEVIC)

Publishing year

2025-12-15

Language

English

Publication/Series

Journal of Academic Ethics

Volume

24

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Springer

Topic

  • Ethics

Keywords

  • Ethics regulation
  • Ethical review
  • group interviews
  • social science
  • Humanities
  • Research ethics

Status

Published

Research group

  • Human Rights Law
  • Health Law
  • Public Law
  • Law, Evidence and Cognition (LEVIC)

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1570-1727