The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Titti Mattsson. Photo.

Titti Mattsson

Professor

Portrait of Titti Mattsson. Photo.

International scope of biomedical research ethics review : Many countries consider long-term implications for society

Author

  • Mark A. Rothstein
  • Kelly Carty Zimmerer Zimmerer
  • Pamela Andanda
  • Thalia Arawi
  • Fabiana Arzuaga
  • Haidan Chen
  • Martine de Vries
  • Edward Dove
  • Mohammed Ghaly
  • Ryoko Hatanaka
  • Aart C Hendriks
  • Mireya Castañeda Hernández
  • Calvin W. L. Ho
  • Yann Joly
  • Dorota Krekora-Zając
  • Won Bok Lee
  • Titti Mattsson
  • Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor
  • Kakai Namalwa
  • Pilar Nicolás
  • Jane Nielsen
  • Obiajulu Nnamuchi
  • Margaret Otlowski
  • Nicole Palmour
  • Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag
  • Gil Siegal
  • Jane M. Wathuta
  • Ma’n H. Zawati
  • Bartha Martha Knoppers

Summary, in Swedish

In the context of biomedical research
involving human subjects, the review
of research proposals by ethics committees
in virtually every country has
traditionally focused on informed consent
and other protections for individuals
participating in research (1). However,
the substantial societal implications of
modern biomedical research and the globalization
of scientific inquiry make it important
to understand whether research
ethics review in each country addresses
both individual and societal issues. Knowledge
of the practices internationally can
promote understanding and can suggest
possible innovations for specific countries.
Below, we explore three related issues: (i)
whether biomedical research ethics review
considers the societal and long-term implications
of the research, (ii) whether bodies
charged with performing research ethics
reviews are appropriate to consider these
issues, and (iii) the feasibility and likely
support for embedding multidisciplinary
researchers with scientists to study societal
and long-term implications. We address
current regulatory policies and offer
comments about possible changes.

Department/s

  • Department of Law
  • Public Law
  • Health Law
  • Norma Research Programme
  • Human Rights Law
  • LU Profile Area: Proactive Ageing
  • Law and Vulnerabilities
  • LU Profile Area: Human rights

Publishing year

2024-07-14

Language

English

Pages

145-147

Publication/Series

Science

Volume

385

Issue

6705

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Topic

  • Law

Keywords

  • Biomedical research ethics
  • Societal implications
  • Ethical review board
  • Law and ethics
  • Administrative law
  • Biomedical research ethics
  • Societal implications
  • Ethical review board
  • Law and ethics
  • Förvaltningsrätt

Status

Published

Project

  • AIR Lund - Artificially Intelligent use of Registers
  • Law and vulnerabilities
  • Vulnerability in the Automated State

Research group

  • Public Law
  • Health Law
  • Norma Research Programme
  • Human Rights Law
  • Law and Vulnerabilities

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1095-9203